The ongoing battle between China and the United States is threatening to paralyze the most powerful body at the United Nations – the UN Security Council (UNSC) -, which has virtually gone missing in action on some of the key politically-sensitive issues of the day.
The Council has scrupulously avoided any resolutions on the devastation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has claimed the lives of over 500,000 people worldwide, while it has remained silent on Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ call for a global cease-fire in war-ravaged countries, including Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

Summing up the dysfunctional state of the UNSC, UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said: “We have not seen a statement (from the Security Council) on COVID 19. (And) we have not seen a statement on the Secretary-General’s call on global ceasefire”. The warring parties in current conflicts are backed, directly or indirectly, by the five permanent members (P5) of the UNSC: the US, UK, France, Russia and China who are providing either political or military support– or both.

The big powers have a longstanding tradition of protecting their allies and their own national interests while covering up each other’s military sins — mostly on a reciprocal basis. As an Asian diplomat remarked, “the underlying principle is: You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours”.

The Security Council, Dujarric rightly pointed out, has primacy in the UN over issues of peace and security. “A strong statement from that body, a strong unified statement from that body supporting the Secretary General’s call for a global ceasefire, would go a long way in making a call for a ceasefire a reality”, he added.

Ian Williams, a veteran journalist who has covered the UN since the 1980s and currently president of the New York Foreign Press Association, states that it is past time for the grown-ups in the UN to get together to call out the UNSC, especially the recidivist veto-brandishers like the US, China and Russia. Even the Trump administration is not impervious to rebuffs, he added.

“When the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was going to veto a peacekeeping mission in Haiti over its recognition of Taiwan, the Ambassador Juan Somavia (of Chile) warned on behalf of the Latin American members of the consequences to their reputations. The consequences do not have to be critical – they can be cumulative since even the P5 (Five permanent members) need support.”

Williams, author of “UNtold: The Real Story of the United Nations in Peace and War,” thinks the Secretary General Antonio Guterres, exceeds the quota on diplomacy. “Perhaps he should abandon any ambitions for a second term and, while he still has it, use his moral authority as custodian of the Charter to name and shame those who hold up crucial decisions for national ego”.

The Trump administration broke ranks and blocked consideration of a proposed resolution on COVID19– because it did not specifically single out China by name. If such a resolution came up before the Council, the Chinese would obviously have vetoed it.

At the same time, no Security Council member would dare introduce a resolution supporting pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, criticize the brutal suppression of Uighurs Muslims in China or condemn Israel for threatening to annex Palestinian territory.

As Guterres said during his press conference last week: “The problem is not that multilateralism is not up to the challenges the world faces. The problem is that today’s multilateralism lacks scale, ambition and teeth.”

Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics at the University of San Francisco and coordinator of the program in Middle Eastern Studies, states that since the founding of the UN, one or more of the five permanent members have periodically abused their veto power or threat thereof to block action on important matters even concerning the UNSC itself. “Calls for reforming the Security Council, such as requiring a super-majority of some kind rather than a consensus of the P5 have been proposed, but largely ignored,” he said.

Zunes pointed out that the current U.S. administration is particularly extreme in its efforts to thwart the will of international community, however. The strongly pro-Israel administrations of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon did not oppose a series of UNSC resolutions against Israel’s annexation of greater East Jerusalem. The strongly pro-Israel Reagan administration supported the unanimous resolution opposing Syria’s annexation of the Golan Heights. Yet the Trump administration is blocking any action in opposition to Israel’s plans of annexing large swathes of the occupied West Bank, declared Zunes.

The outspoken UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet added her voice to the growing international and national calls on the Government of Israel not to proceed with its plans to illegally annex a swathe of occupied Palestinian territory. It would have a disastrous impact on human rights of Palestinians and across the region, she said. Meanwhile the UNSC has taken no action on the issue.

In a hard-hitting statement, released June 30, US Ambassador Kelly Craft lambasted China’s gross human rights abuses.  “I salute the United Nations special rapporteurs and human rights experts for courageously breaking this silence and standing up for the Chinese people.” She was referring to the June 26 statement issued by UN rapporteurs and experts reveals the true state of human rights in the People’s Republic of China. It outlines the CCP’s systematic repression of religious and ethnic minorities; the disappearance and detention of lawyers and human rights defenders; and the regime’s use of forced labor. She said the world has known about the Chinese Communist Party’s gross and systematic abuses of human rights for decades, but too often turned a blind eye. But she stopped short of taking any action in the Security Council.

See here the original edition Cover-up at the UN: You Scratch My Back and I’ll Scratch Yours